Insightful. That line about 'a country cannot arbitrarily decide which countries are "safe"' perfectly encapsulates the core issue. It's troubling how many EU governments where eager to follow this path. Thanks for highlighting the implications and the ECJ's crucial intervention.
Hi Daniel, thank you for your interest and for your comment. Yes, the push for the broadening use of arbitrary definitions is also in line with the general context of erosion of international law. It is indeed very troubling.
Let me take the opportunity to clarify that phase:shift is currently still under construction, and the official launch is planned for November 10. Please don't hesitate to follow us in the meantime, you are very welcome!
Insightful. That line about 'a country cannot arbitrarily decide which countries are "safe"' perfectly encapsulates the core issue. It's troubling how many EU governments where eager to follow this path. Thanks for highlighting the implications and the ECJ's crucial intervention.
Hi Daniel, thank you for your interest and for your comment. Yes, the push for the broadening use of arbitrary definitions is also in line with the general context of erosion of international law. It is indeed very troubling.
Let me take the opportunity to clarify that phase:shift is currently still under construction, and the official launch is planned for November 10. Please don't hesitate to follow us in the meantime, you are very welcome!